contact me introduction biography press coverage gallery some other places to visit


Press & Writings On Cypher


"Here, Keith Haring and some ur-macho expressionism fights it out with old-style painting in what almost looks like a group show, so changing are [Cypher’s] own voices. [Cypher] takes on portraiture and the world of sleaze with some gusto, but varying convictions… Downstairs, quasi-erotic works play with porno-mag images, with little of the danger, threat or tingles that can make such work worthwhile… You sense [Cypher] has something to say and the basic means to say it; it is now a matter of deciding which voice is his own."
Mebh Ruane. The Sunday Times, 27th October 1996.

"Cypher spends a lot of time thinking about sex – which may make him unique among artists, but certainly not among men…[Cypher] is a multi-faceted 29-year-old who thrives on his complexity, much like a difficult adolescent. He has been so busy trying to convince the world of his genius over the years that he has failed to focus hard enough on his art style or complete an art degree…Cypher handed me his CV when we met; it details the trials and traumas of his life as if he was the world’s most famous artist and not one who has just got his first break. He takes himself and his life rather seriously…[He] christened himself Cypher (meaning “nonentity”) back in 1991, at a time when he felt a complete failure, both as a man and as an artist. He also calls himself The Panic Artist – because he says, we are living in a time of panic for men. I suppose it makes sense for an artist with a borderline personality disorder to have two alter egos instead of just one…Cypher has to learn that art is as much about skill as ideas. To clinch a place in the collectors' hearts he needs a more consistent style. “Rejection has made me bitter,” he says. It’s a shame success hasn’t changed that."
Gayle Killilea, Sunday Independent, 13th August 2000.

“Is there is [Sic] sufficient redemptive power in Cypher’s work to offset the offense, and even pain, which it will cause to some? Is it art? I think so. But both artist and viewer are in some way vulnerable when facing these images. Cypher manages, at times, to produce a quieter category of work: drawings, for example, of great power, of understated, lyrical beauty. It is these that make me wonder about his “transgressive” work: wonder if behind that the [Sic] riot of provocation, passion and porn, there might be a great sensitivity and above all vulnerability. Cypher’s story is as remarkable as his art. I was baffled by his persistence, creating hundreds of canvases over dozens of years, in the face of rejection after rejection. The words and images in Cypher’s work are disarmingly and perhaps uniquely frank about personal feelings, vulnerabilities and experiences. The longer I looked, the more determined I became to understand the motivation and philosophy behind it all… I had always deferred to Paul O’Kelly in matters of art history – but now I had found someone more than ready to give him a run for his money! Cypher’s knowledge of his subject was encyclopedic… He cited influences as far back as the Renaissance, and shows as recent as last week: New York, London, Berlin – whatever was on, Cypher knew about it, talked about it and had sent away for the catalogue… All this bolstered my conviction, first prompted by his drawings, that he was to be taken seriously. The large erotic canvases are undoubtedly tougher, and for obvious reasons more open to attack (see Unacceptable by Olive Braiden overleaf). Have I made friends with these huge copulating nudes? Certainly not. Yet I have been startled to discover, looking at those terrible, frantic orgies of flesh, reflections of images which float, freely and openly as we speak, in the collective unconscious.”
Donal Mc Neela, Twenty Years of Panic Art, 2000.

"Ireland's colonial past, and our inheritance of a bizarre Jansenist/Victorian variant on Catholicism, creates further opportunities for emasculation. Many writers and artists have depicted the colonised sate as an impotent or impoverished man; some (most notably O`Casey) represented that emasculation both literally and metaphorically. The "hero" of Juno and the Paycock, for example, is a swaggering tribute to the frustrated ambitions of the disenfranchised Irish father-figure… [Cypher] continues a parallel exploration of the other, counterpart option: become a Feminised Man… But the Irish woman has shown as little interest as any other in Feminised Man. Feminisation was offered to the modern male as the kiss of life, a way of allowing him to remain viable when machines had made traditional machismo embarrassing and anachronistic. Yet the feminist kiss of life turned out to be the kiss of death. Female Man`s sexual unviabilty is now routinely affirmed in words of withering mockery (wimp; wus; pussy)… On one level, it is possible to read Cypher`s own coming of age, sexually and artistically, as a metaphor for the coming of age of the State. Self-Portrait with My mother in Florida… Crams into a single image a remarkable parable of how the Irish have handled this rite of passage: The "couple" assert their independence from British cultural norms by plunging into American pop culture: attending a Florida theme park and even, in young Cypher`s case; wearing the uniform appropriate to the War of Independence. Bur Cypher`s message is superbly ambiguous: yes, he joins his mother in finding freedom in ex-colonial America - but he also uses the occasion to dress up in adult gear, thereby asserting his independence from his mother. The fact that both participants assume an earnest, even somber expression (in the fun setting of a carnival booth) only emphasizes the gravity of the event: the schism is touched, for both sides, with pain and remorse… To.. critics, Cypher`s meditations on pornography belong with the bad skin, the lonely passions and all the other embarrassments and impediments of youth. Yet the extraordinary Dear Woman series.. offers, on its own, more than enough to answer such charges. It is too startling, original and thought-provoking to be dismissed as juvenilia… Cypher an adult male, burdened with the familiar cultural and anthropological imperatives, is telling us about his own short comings and failures, today. His complaints, confessions and regrets are precise and specific. He is letting the side down. He is letting women in on the secrets of the battered male psyche. He is even perhaps, decoding for women the terror and insecurity behind empty male machismo… In Librium, an individual woman fixes the individual viewer with her gaze. The sheer size of the work (it is nearly six feet high) means there is no escape. Her eyes are inviting, not, as in Demoiselles [ d`Avignon 1906-7] contemptuous… Cypher does just enough… to shatter any notion of a conventionally romantic/erotic, private intimacy… her confident expression suggests a disconcerting grasp, on her part, of the workings of male desire."
Paul O`Kelly Twenty Years Of Panic Art, 2000.

"The scope, range and technique evident in Cypher`s work is undeniably impressive: this is not an artist one can dismiss out of hand. However, his use, often quite raw, of pornographic and therefore highly problematic source material is simply unacceptable… Most troubling are the collages, of which No Host… would be among the most confrontational examples… He may well feel the need, for reasons of irony, comment or context, to quote the cliches of transgressive eroticism: genital fetishisation, lesbian exhibitionism… But he is not so much quoting as representing. Images are cut out and pasted down, framed but unedited by the surrounding paint, crayon and pastel. None of this source material could have been created without exploitation, danger and degradation…Often I find myself revisiting and revising my initial reactions. Some paintings, for example Solipsist, come back to me again and again, at times as erotic, at times as exploitative - and it is this latter characteristic that makes them unacceptable…I hope I'm not alone in being somewhat bewildered and overwhelmed by Cypher`s imagery - two firm convictions remain: First, I find the direct use of pornographic magazines deeply offensive; and second Cypher appears to have obvious talent and serious artistic intent. For me it is often the drawings that succeed, on both artistic and erotic levels. For all their simplicity, they are challenging. The remnants of Cypher`s many battles, personal and artistic, seem to haunt them. At the same time they revel a bravura technique employed in search of vivid and direct beauty. Elsewhere, in the paintings, I see glimpses of anxiety, pan, humour and arousal, but I have difficulty sinking into these pictures. I can admire them without liking them. A professional contact, lasting some seventeen years now, with the issues and ideas involved might incline me even less than most to hang them in my living room."
Olive Braiden ( The Rape Crisis Center Dublin) Twenty Years of Panic Art, 2000.

"For years he was the flying Dutchman of the Irish art scene, rumoured to exist in a bleak world of nihilism and pornography, heard but not seen. He was the kind of artist other artists used to frighten their children with at bed time… [His] attitude to sex is remote, distasteful and uniquely Irish. The artist’s may claim that his work is about the emasculation of men and their confusion about their place in modern society now that feminists have realised they don’t want feminised men. But there is nothing in the visual work itself to explain that position. What we see is not, contrary to what some observers believe, demeaning to women. It is simply demeaning to sex. There is no joy in the work…. It’s a pity that the use of pornographic magazines will become the focal point of the exhibition because some of his paintings are wonderful."
Ian O’Doherty, The Evening Herald, 6th November, 2000.

"I first met [Cypher] in 1993 when he was a scarcely socialised young guy whose manic conversation was peppered with an eyebrow-raising sweep of literary and artistic references, most of which he had consumed in complete isolation. He seemed to eat biographies of artists like Picasso or Balthus for breakfast, and swung wildly between messianic faith in himself as an artist and a crippling lack of self-confidence and, as he says himself, “nothing in between”…. The show contains many explicit paintings of ecstatic, theatricalised coitus; while others involve pornographic imagery directly collaged onto the canvas. [Cypher] has also produced self-portraits of self-mutilation and howling anguish, or blunt depictions of the packaging of psychiatric drugs and anti-depressants. There’s lots of urgently scrawled text concerning consciousness, memory, language, intractable issues of charged male sexuality, and the druggy youth subculture he encountered in his early 20s… Technically, it is extremely uneven but the best work grips with its flailing spontaneity, its willful shattering of taboos of penile sexuality… Around this time too, [Cypher] began writing the Panic texts, enormous swathes of poetry, maxims, fantasies, rants against radical feminists such as Dworkin, and indeed the “panic biography”, which spans his earliest memories to his unfurling social life, and is written with scorching honesty. It mercilessly documents the Dublin nightlife of recreation drug-taking and unhappy sexual encounters. The text, as it circulated in various drafts, led to rows between people as it emerged that [Cypher] was writing virtually every conversation and bitching session into art-history… Personally, I still find a lot of it powerful, tragic and disturbing,"
Mic Moroney, The Irish Times, 7th November 2000.

"He writes of the angst he suffered during his teenage years and his love/hate relationship with women, pretty much exactly what you’d expect from a tortured artist. However; who is the more tortured – the artist or those that must look at his work? That all depends on your point of view; [Cypher’s] work shrieks from the wall, drowning the onlooker with his anguish… The collection would perhaps be more powerful if it wasn’t attacking the viewer from every angle. And no matter how the subject-matter of some of the work is talked up, it is still extremely uncomfortable for most women to peruse paintings depicting explicit images of gaping vaginas or a female performing fellatio on three penises, no matter how masterly the composition or the brush-strokes of the artist. [Cypher] describes his art as cathartic although it more closely resembles a form of purging in an attempt to abolish the demons that haunt him. Displaying his struggle so publicly and graphically may help him, but it is uncertain how the public at large is educated, illuminated or entertained by his efforts."
Helen Murray, The Sunday Tribune, 19th November 2000.

"The screaming self-portraits from the mid-1990`s… are delirious with agonized paint splashes, a visualized explosion of emotion and pain, the pornographic collages; all present us with images to which it is very difficult not to have an almost purely emotional reaction at first. This conflict between mental and emotional reaction to some of these pieces is powerful; disgust and desire to look again battle it out, we find ourselves put in the position of a voyeur, invited to take one more look…. Cypher has chosen honesty over aesthetics. Susan Sontag describes Bataille`s work as "an erotics of agony"; Cypher might just be his visual counterpart. He has painted the erotics of agony… the confessional style takes on a darker edge when you realise that far from the freedom and control or realizing visually his fantasies, Cypher paints copies and in the most telling cases collages someone else's fantasies, fantasies shared by a huge anonymous male readership, thus reducing the user of such pornography to a slavish worship of unreal constructions. Looking at the huge canvases it's difficult not to feel that the people exploited and demeaned the most by pornography are the who men use it, substituting real emotions and real women with a safe though lonely pastime."
Ruth Herrington, TNT: Trinty News Two, December 6th 2000

“[Cypher’s] work does not explicitly elaborate on the experimental artistic ideas and styles of our times, but focus on emotional experiences – anxiety, loneliness, frustrations and broken aspirations represent the bulk of his production and, in fact I believe, are at the heart of his success… [Cypher’s] ‘ artistic expression derives from the asymmetry between aspiration and reality, conformity and diversity, identity and difference, freedom and necessity. His pursuit of the absolute through pleasure is an attempt to reconcile the irreconcilable and confront what we usually refuse to acknowledge… [Cypher] says he does not mean to be subversive, but merely tries to live his own individuality and as such his work is a means to some kind of catharsis. Locked in his private grief, depression and despair, [Cypher] brings us to the verge of madness. His erotic pursuit can be seen as a reminder of the problematic status of identity surrounding the crisis of representation that characterizes our society. A world governed by hedonistic forms of consumption, where the body has become a commodity and the subject is increasingly being identified through the object (not its use-value but sign-value)."
Maria Walter LSB College, Dublin School of Business magazine, 2000.

"Much of his own life story is bleak. His journey, as is clear from his various texts as well as his paintings, is one of continuous, monotonous rejection. From his earliest work in the 1980`s to the show Twenty Years of Panic Art in November 2000, he managed to sell not one single painting, drawing or collage. The exhibition changed all that: over fifty works were sold, including an enormous orgy triptych, Dialectic of Emotion (1995), which changed hands for a five-figure sum. Until recently, Cypher`s work has been seen as too pornographic or transgressive to show. Every move he made was circumscribed by this fact. Over and over again, he encountered - even in the art-world elite - a kind of Pavlovian reaction to genitals, copulating couples, collaged pornography and other taboo imagery. But there was, I found, a curiously desultory quality to those "anti" reactions. People spoke up merely to get their objections out of the way. Often, their misgivings appeared to have a second-hand, half-hearted quality to them. Having dispensed with the ritual of being shocked, detractors often went on to pay generous compliments to individual pieces… It is not telling tales out of school to reveal that Cypher and I clashed continuously over what I felt was his best work…. I felt that his more straightforward realistic work, particularly his portraits and group scenes, contained a wealth of subject, emotion, subtlety and commentary… The artist, on the other hand, valued his more expressionistic work, and those pieces involving textual commentary, photocollage and other devices. My own wish is for Cypher to trust his art, to leave well enough alone. He believes, on the other hand, that unembellished imagery - the inside of a nightclub, a portrait, a female nude - is trite and uninteresting. The case continues…Cypher`s fantasies are mainstream, his pinings commonplace, his triumphs and disappointments familiar. It is his talent and his utter frankness that make Cypher unique…These qualities have helped to create the urban myth of Cypher (which, apparently, was doing the rounds of Dublin bohemia long before his Twenty Years show) as a kind of sexual and artistic bogey-man. Perhaps part of the mission in this performance is for him to proclaim, or reclaim, his ordinariness and with it his dignity. "
Paul O`Kelly, Five Day Wonder: Exhibition and Performance, 2002.

“[Cypher] reckons that he's spent the best part of 20 years living and working in his bedroom-art studio. "I've been denounced as a lazy waster," he says. "I spent 20 years of my life alone, no money, no recognition, no social life." But now, as Cypher/ The Panic Artist, [Cypher] has put his talent in the shop window by re-creating his bedroom on the floor of the Oisin Gallery. Until Saturday, he will live and work under the watchful eye of the public. [He] adopted the name Cypher in 1991. "I was very depressed," he recalls. "I tried to commit suicide. Cypher means a non-person. If I am a non-entity I will make a virtue out of the fact. All my art is about that. "Every human being is flawed. You can either hide from your flaws and pretend you're something you're not or you can simply say, 'This is who I am'." His health is better these days. "I haven't attempted suicide for eight years," he says jauntily. For this show, Cypher has recreated his living space in the gallery in Westland Row. He's got his TV, hi-fi and CD`s. His favourite pictures are on the walls. His bed is surrounded by books and video cassettes. They're almost all hardcore porn - source material for many of his disturbing and explosive paintings. "Cypher is preoccupied with making public what is private," explains gallery curator Paul O` Kelly. "His fantasies are mainstream. It is his talent and his utter frankness that make Cypher unique." On Tuesday his show was attracting above average numbers. Many viewers took time to talk to the artist as he sat on his bed. For Cypher, the work of art is the entire process, not the fame or the finished product. "It's the painting and me interacting with people, " he says. His Oisin gallery debut show last year was a commercial success with over £20,000 worth of paintings and drawings, many of them of garish reproductions of genitalia, bought by collectors."
Eamonn Carr Evening Herald, Thursday 14th March 2002.

"One of [Cypher’s] main themes in his work is emasculation, which he demonstrates in many of his self-portraits…. By posing himself in positions of castration. He shows the place of man within a femminised modern society, especially a man without confidence, wealth or social standing…In 'Inferno', [Cypher’sr] expression is contorted with rage and agony and he tears at his throat with clawing hands. The background of the painting does a lot to portray its mood and, its theme of mental anguish. The colours are loud and garish and look as though they have been splashed or dabbed onto the canvas. Over the colourful background, [Cypher] has painted his self-portrait in a much more careful way, the effect of the realist portrait of the artist on the wild and feverishly painted background with black paint splashed over the canvas, is extremely striking. It is almost uncomfortable to view this painting as the artist is laying himself bare, his body, his fears and his insecurities…The trace technique which [Cypher] use for this creates an image which is quite crude and comic strip like. This has its own impact as although you are aware that the image has been taken directly from pornographic reference material, it creates distance. You are able to judge the subject matter and the message alone for a moment and forget the origins of the image. In this way I find this technique quite successful, as it promotes thought in the viewer without the initial reaction of disgust or discomfort created by the more direct collages…I find these pieces [photo-collages like 'No Host, 1993'] the most difficult to stomach, although I do appreciate the ideas of self-exploration and self-expression which I feel they signify. The direct quotation of the imagery disturbs me and gets in the way of my appreciation of the work…'The Trauma of the Voyeur, (1993)… Is a large oil painting which, although does not use the porno-collage technique or trace technique, has obviously taken its inspiration from pornographic source material. It is an example of [Cypher’s] painting directly from pornographic sources, enlarging, and mixing up the images from different sources…I find [Cypher’s] large paintings from pornographic sources…interesting they do not disturb me to the extent to which the porno-collage works do. So it is easier for me to appreciate and understand what [Cypher] is trying to say with these pieces. At the same time, [Cypher’s] work's which take direct reference from pornography…do not for me convey as much feeling as his self-portraits…I can connect with the emotions which [Cypher] is putting across and I find these works much more satisfying."
Emma Betts, 'The Influences of Contemporary Irish Society and Culture on the Definition of Masculinity, Seen Through the Work of Artist [Cypher]', N.C.A.D. 2003.

"Application techniques are variable and inconsistent but the effect is never dull. Here you become strangely detached Peeping Tom in a small and joyless claustrophobic world painted monstrously big. Group sexual athletics ad nauseam are captured on large canvases in the grand manner of a master's recording of an historic event…Cypher, survivor of a traumatic childhood, is serious, intelligent and mature beyond his thirty years…Visitors are confused as to the purpose of this exhibition. Five Day Wonder has attracted folk with issues on their minds, not folk with ample funds…The new painting by Cypher`s bed has been added to since yesterday evening. An African mask like visage stares out at me from its painted nest of thickly applied gray-white swirls, an image of alienation amid a sea of turbulence. It seems as though the canvas has been attacked with a dagger rather than a brush. Has Cypher finally put his feelings instead of his mental images into paint for the first time ever, allowed the deadpan control to finally slip? This is the first of his paintings I have seen that has allowed the emergence of emotion. Those angry red paroxysms. What is inside - outside… Even though Five Day Wonder has been little more than a sounding-board for the walking wounded, a week long public therapy session, the experiment appears to have had an astounding result in the artist himself. The experience may well prove to be Cypher`s way forward to the future, a liberating future for both himself and his art."
Paula W. Hayes 'Five Day Wonder', 2002.